Sunday, July 12, 2009

Happily Ever After?

We were at the bookstore today and I came across 'I'd Trade My Husband for a Housekeeper' a 'keeping your marriage together after babies' kind of book.

***me lets out of a big pocket of breath***

And egad, did it speak to me. In fact, it reached out, stroked me & gave me a fracking orgasm.

I can't tell you how afraid I have been to say that my marriage is not a 'happily ever after', not because it isn't working out but because my expectation of 'happily ever after' really has been so insanely high that the poor boy never did stand a chance.

  • The book talks about women thinking of marriage (and I paraphrase here) as the comparatively easy part (And I am so guilty of this - the hard part was finding the boy, getting the parents to agree, planning the beautiful wedding - so definitely the marriage should be easier). Whereas men see marriage as a sort of 'giving up of things' - which though it sounds terribly unromantic, makes them better prepared to face up to the work that a marriage is.
  • It also talks about the shift in gender roles that has left men and women confused and confrontational about what they should / should not be doing within the house & without. Like, there is no more a road map for this generation to look to as to what their roles should be like. We are constantly redefining ourselves & striving towards equality in our marriage.
  • One of the best quotes in the book is from a 10 year veteran of marriage, & it goes:
"My poor husband has cereal three nights a week. I feel awful about that - I know I should be doing more! I have this anger about having to do it...I know that it's expected, so I rebel and don't do it and then feel guilty for not doing it"

Oh unknown Sara from Becks County, USA - you made me cry!!!

I don't mind feeding the husband
I don't mind cooking for the husband
I don't mind making his meals
It is so traditional and so what my mom used to do that I am having a hard time even writing the fact.
I like cooking but I hate being expected to do it.
I hate being looked at as a wife because, much as I love my liberated-in-comparison-to-the-rest-of-the-family father, there were so many things I heartily disliked about what my dad expected my mom to do that I vowed that when I got married things would be different.

And though our relationship is vastly different, yet I yearn for perfect equilibrium.

  • The book speaks of how "in this pro-feminist era....with more choices & opportunities...we expect to be happier than our mothers".
How very true! I thought that since I had grown up in much more unrestrained world than my mother, I expected to be much more in control & to be in a more perfect relationship (which in my mind, equates to happiness).

And while I am, yet there seemed to be a constant need to do more, to experience more photograph worthy moments, to have more, to be yet more closer.

It's almost like I was trying to judge my own marriage/relationship from what it looked like from outside & found it lacking perfection.

'We are supposed to be romantic'
'We are supposed to be out and about'
'Our wedding anniversary has to be superlative. Superlative I tell you!'
'We need to be having more sex and being more adventurous'


Old news but it took seeing it in print for me to realise I was struggling not with the boy's expectations but with my own.

I am happy. Not excited in a Harlequin romance sort of way. He doesn't make my heart flutter all the time like he used to when we first started dating, we don't rip off each other's clothes all over the house as much as we used to, sometimes we are out and we have really boring conversations.

Is that normal?
Are we normal to be like this after 7.5 years of being together?

And today, the boy & I were discussing it and he was like - you think we don't talk enough???
Ugh.
Don't you even remember who I was when we first started going out?

And gawd, yes I do - that reticent gangly man with a cute behind who grunted his way through a conversation.

And we have come so far!

And yet, I want more. NOW!

I know that the boy is a far far cry from any of the male role models in our combined families.

But he is not yet the Renaissance man.

An example:
You think you know everything about a person and then he comes out with - 'no, I won't be comfortable with our child being gay'.
And it boggled me.
Because he has gay friends. And I have gay friends. And we have mutual gay friends.

And to confront the fact that we have such fundamental differences as above perplexed me.
Because hadn't we known each other forever?

Where does that leave me?
His nonacceptance of a potentially gay child?
Why is it easy for him to accept gay strangers and not a gay flesh and blood?

Side note:
He would not budge even in the face of disapproval from friends. I suppose it is good that he's stating his opinions and not pretending to be one person online and another offline who goes 'Oh no, I couldn't possibly move in with
that person, because he/she is gay/divorced/single mother'.

Another instance, he still maintains that the appropriation of Palestinian land by Israelis is justified.
How is it that we can love each other and yet have such vastly different view points?

It's been a struggle for me to get away from the fact that two did not become one after our marriage. We are still two different entities, with unique personalities and differences, living in love. And to accept that that is fine too, in fact it may just well be fantastic - our differences creating a more interesting household.

The relief has also come from the fact that with the boy, there is no pressure to be similar.
From him, there is always acceptance of differing view points & even a matter-of-factdnessabout it.
He accepts my attitude and I am learning (v.slowly) to accept his conservatism.

And live with the fact that perhaps we may see eye to eye in the future or we may not.

It seems like such obvious fact but I am constantly surprised that our relationship is still a work in progress.

20 comments:

Sig said...

Ahhh babe - totally know exactly what you are talking about!

You know, you have been reading my sturggles as well - not just bedroom wise but all that it stands for really.

It's a huge shock.

amna said...

gosh! the quote that made u cry rang so true to me and left me all tingly-eyed too..

its so true man!

Spicy Chai said...

Thank you! I've been married for almost 2 years to a man I'd been seeing for 6 years when we got married. We're in exactly the same place, and I've a feeling we will always be in this place. We've moved from uncertainty about how the house is to be run to a relatively smoothly functioning house, but uncertainty about how future children are to be disciplined (and children are a way off).

I can see we've come a long way, and it's been work for both of us, but that the work is far from over :) Glad to know that it's completely normal.

Spicy Chai.

Tarantismo said...

Echoing everyone else, I KNOW WHAT YOU MEAN !!!
Me, thank you for making me feel normal. I'm so relieved. Why doesn't any tell us this stuff right at the beginning ?!

hillgrandmom said...

From a grandmom--in reply to Tarantismo--they do, they do! ['Why doesn't any tell us this stuff right at the beginning ?!'] But when it's someone from one's parent's generation telling you, you reject it as old-fashioned nonsense. But then, that is the way the world works and the young always want to be better than their predecessors, which is why our earth is still spinning I guess :-)
Sorry for the long comment Me.

Me said...

Oh Hillgrandmom, you are right!! In fact, I wasn't even listening when my wonderful best friend told me that there would be some starting troubles. I just thought having lived together we had ironed out those issues. But I think marriage does throws in a whole new set of expectations into the equation.

Well, I guess we are laying some kind of communicative groundwork for the meatier issues that are (for sure) going to turn up as we age along.

M said...

So marriage is not for the faint-hearted?


*gulp*

Some encouraging words for the single but soon to be married girls please?

Anonymous said...

Encouraging words...hmm...it gets better. Every year is more wondrous than the one before. And I read somewhere that the most successful couples are not those that solve their arguments, but tolerate them.

hey Me, it wasn't just your description of the book, but how you related it to your life that was so moving and insightful!

The best kind of book review....

M.L.

Anonymous said...

Hmmm..now I don't feel so shitty about being single all the bloody time!! :D Bwwaahahahaaa.!

Childwoman~

D said...

I don't think there will be a single married person around who won't agree with this! Having known my husband for five years before marriage, one would think I'd have known pretty much everything there is to know about a person. But how wrong that was. Five years after marriage I still keep peeling layers off his personality and discovering a newer him! And no, none of the new man I see conforms to the idea of the man I wanted to marry.

Also, the bit about breaking sown of gender roles has actually left the woman at least saddled with more guilt that one could guess. We all know that, don't we?

Tarantismo said...

hillgrandmom, I was told about the 'need for adjustment' and 'tolerance' and 'not letting ego get in the way'. But that's the easy part. The tough part is dealing with the guilt and inadequacy. No one ever told me about that stuff !!
Well , like you said, I'd probably have brushed it off as old-fashioned nonsense !!
This is the kind of stuff that you'll only learn the hard way !!

Careless Chronicles said...

LOL.... I'm wondering how much more harder it's going to be to accept if the kids turn out to be different from you. They're supposed to be a product of your genes and upbringing. All of a sudden when they spout conservative or even mean stuff, it takes you aback so much more. The spouse is training. Not that it gets you ready for the kids, though... Nothing does, actually.

Anonymous said...

Marriage does not mean that two individuals should be one, think same, like same things . I feel its two INDIVIDUALS living together. It is the same like living with ur friend. She can watch a movie and you can listen to songs not neccesarily you do all things together because u are married. Why cookinga nd house hold things govern ur marriage??? Why think its a duty?
Why not think its part of our life?

Anonymous said...

and what I feel is sex is overrated anyways.. is the key to a happy and well contented life is having sex frequently ??? I dont belive it. again it is just a thing which will amuse you when it is new and then the newness goes off. Why treat it like a big problem? Is not it important that the person is there to hold you at night and he is there just for u and be it any problem he is just one touch away??

Me said...

Hey Annon,

Interesting points.
I quite agree with that two individuals do not become one after marriage. It's something I am getting used to. The struggle for me was that we came from a 6 yr live-in relationship where I thought all the difference had already been revealed, discussed & accepted. So, it's startling to find 'new layers' as D puts it.

As for your second point,I am not really sure what you were trying to say by 'why cooking & house hold things govern ur marriage?'
I certainly do not ever want accept taking care of the house as 'my duty' because it reeks of sexism. I understand that right now, it's my turn since I am almost unemployed. But is it my duty simply because I am a woman? I'd like to look at household chores as being
'our' thing because it is 'our' life, 'our' meals & 'our' house.
Thankfully, I am married to someone who does more than his share of things around the house. But I suppose I just want more.

And the sex thing???
OMG - are you in a relationship?
If you are, how is it possible to think that infrequent sex is ok?
It's not just an amusement - it's a way of expressing love and connecting on such a deep level. Ok sometimes, it's just primal. And sometimes it's just for fun.
But other times, it's about something bigger than all that.

You are right that it is important to have a person who will hold you at night and be there for you. But sex & emotional availability are not mutually exclusive.
Having a fantastic & vibrant & or even an existing sex life does not rule out emotional availability.

Don't get me wrong. I am extremely thankful for having a person who I can talk openly with about all these issues. But I refuse to compromise on sex or on what I want just so I can be thankful that he is there for me.


uhmm...(self actualization moment here)
And that I suppose is why I am with him - because, he's constantly willing (through fights & screams & silent treatments & laughter & etcs) to put in the effort to make this relationship better. Aww..

~The Dream Catcher~ said...

I canNOT tell you how comforting your post is. Every other blog I read of married couples/couples is all about perfectness, fitting together like a T, being one with each other, just.. perfectness you know? And as someone, who is relatively in a fresh relationship, but looking at a lifetime together - this post is so much relieving. I used to think I was crazy to not feel like my boyfriend was "the one", or it broke my heart when I realized that he was not starry eyed about us being together, that too after pursuing me for so long.. or when our anniversary was not oh so perfect. OR when he revealed that he would NOT be ok with gay children..
I have always wondered if everyone who's married puts across the real side of their marriage out there. If any blogger actually admits that their marriage is a work-in-progress relationship and your putting it out there, along with explaining why its a perfect relationship means SO MUCH. Thank you. REALLY.

Tarantismo said...

Really Me, thank you so much for this post and thank you for all the comments it brought about. It's been an almost cathartic experience to read them.

CLS said...

"It took seeing it in print for me to realise I was struggling not with the boy's expectations but with my own."

There's something so comforting about reading those words. I don't think I'll drown myself in guilt for thinking something like that anymore...

Sue said...

My husband said the same thing, that he wouldn't be comfortable with a gay child. But you know, he loves his son so dearly I don't see something like mere sexual orientation breaking this bond.

It's one of those things, I have decided, that one's partner says in abstraction. In actuality, life may well pan out quite different.

The Scarlet Realm said...

Dear Me and all the other kindred spirits who commented - your opinons and dilemnas have calmed the troubled waters of my own nuptial reflections.
Having married someone I met and loved for few years before tying the knot I expected life to sail through.
6 years later, I keep finding out how different we are with disparate views and inclinations.

Everything you said Me , and the quote from the book strikes a chord.

Our strong , anti-sexist individualities are struggling with our own neoclassical expections from marriage.